Chris N. Kolos - Lawyer in Orlando, FL
200 South Orange Avenue, Suite 2600,
Orlando, FL 32801
Orlando, FL 32801
Practice Areas
Insurance Law Orlando, FLInsurance Defense Orlando, FLCorporate and Insurance Defense Orlando, FLInsurance Defense Litigation Orlando, FLInsurance Benefits Termination Orlando, FLMass Tort Litigation and Class Actions - Plaintiffs Orlando, FLMass Tort Litigation Orlando, FLLitigation Orlando, FLClass Actions Orlando, FLClass Actions - Defendants Orlando, FL
About the lawyer
Chris N. Kolos is an excellent lawyer from Orlando, FL. Attorney Chris N. Kolos works in an office located at 200 South Orange Avenue, Suite 2600,
Orlando, FL 32801. Orlando lawyer Jared K. Miller will help you solve all issues in the following areas of law: Insurance Law, Insurance Defense, Corporate and Insurance Defense, Insurance Defense Litigation, Insurance Benefits Termination, Mass Tort Litigation and Class Actions - Plaintiffs, Mass Tort Litigation, Litigation, Class Actions, Class Actions - Defendants Orlando, FL. Chris N. Kolos is the best lawyer in Orlando, Florida state!
Chris N. Kolos focuses his practice on the defense ofenvironmental contamination suits, CERCLA litigation, toxic substance exposurecases, and pharmaceutical, products liability, nursing home, assisted livingfacility, and many other types of personal injury cases. He has substantialexperience defending cases involving industrial chemicals and asbestos. He alsodefends insurers in bad faith and insurance coverage cases. He has served asnational coordinating counsel and regional trial counsel for several Fortune500 companies.
Past cases include:
- summary judgment for an insurer in a declaratory judgment action holding that a vendor of a named insured is not an additional insured under a CGL policy where the vendor distributes and leases goods of the named insured but does not re-sell them
- summary judgment in a mesothelioma case on the grounds that a parent corporation was not liable for the alleged negligent acts of its subsidiary
- summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action for an insurer against two co-insurers regarding priority of coverage and the duty to defend a mutual insured in a battle over «other insurance» clauses in the respective policies
- summary judgment for an insurer in a bad faith case establishing a rule that where an insurance company timely pays a claim but fails to meet non-monetary conditions in an offer resulting in the loss of an opportunity to settle a claim filed against its insured that would exceed policy limits, that still does not establish bad faith as a matter of law
- summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action for an insurer based on the intentional acts/expected injury exclusion in a case alleging gross negligence which was substantially certain to result in injury
- summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action applying Florida law to a multi-state/multi-risk insurance policy issued in Ohio such as to bar the claim under Florida law — Wausau v. Baillie, 281 F.Supp.2d 1307 (M.D. Fla. 2002)
- summary judgment upholding an assumption of the risk/release of liability clause relative to a management training teamwork/physical challenge course
- a defense verdict in a mesothelioma case tried in Florida relative to automotive friction products
- an appeal that quashed an asbestos omnibus order which allowed for an accelerated trial of a living plaintiff with mesothelioma to be conducted within three months of the filing date and ordered the trial court to strictly enforce the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure with respect to a case being at issue and ready to be tried — Genuine Parts Company v. Parsons, 917 So.2d 419 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2006)
- summary judgment for an insurer in a declaratory judgment action holding that despite the fact that a golf cart is a motor vehicle under the dangerous instrumentality doctrine, a golf cart is not an «auto» under a business auto policy — Bailey v. Netherlands Insurance Company, 615 F.Supp.2d 1332 (M.D. Fla. 2009)
- a defense verdict representing a major food manufacturer of an admittedly defective product on the grounds that the defect was not the legal cause of the damages sustained
962
Reviews about lawyer Chris N. Kolos